At some stage in your career, you can take yourself in a leadership position in some capacity. You can consider finding with or implementing a specific leadership style if you lead a meeting, a project, a team, or a whole department.
Many professionals build their leadership style depending on experience and personality, their corporation’s requirements, and organizational culture. Although each leader is distinctive, there are several common leadership styles in the workplace.
In this article, we will explain why leadership styles are necessary and some common leadership styles.
Why are Leadership Styles Necessary?
According to a survey conducted, 55 percent of employers believe that asking about leadership styles during an interview is the most effective way to assess an applicant’s ability to excel in a position. When you create leadership skills, you will probably use various processes and strategies to meet your employer’s goals and the requirements of the employees who serve you. You can use many unique leadership styles to be successful in this position at any particular time.
By familiarizing yourself with all of these types of leadership, you can identify specific areas where you can improve or broaden your leadership style. You can also discover how to collaborate with managers who have a different leadership style than yours and explore other ways to manage which might better fit your current objectives.
Some Common Types of Different Leadership Styles
Here are several common types of different leadership styles, which include:
- Coaching leadership style
A coaching leader can rapidly identify the strengths, shortcomings, and motivations of their teammates to assist them in growing. This type of leader frequently helps teammates create smart objectives and gives regular feedback with challenging tasks to encourage improvement. They know how to set clear standards and build a constructive, encouraging atmosphere.
The coach leadership style is among the most beneficial for both companies and their employees. Sadly, it’s frequently one of the most underused leadership styles because it takes more time than other leadership styles.
- Visionary leadership style
Visionary leaders have a solid ability to enforce growth and bring in moments of transition by motivating colleagues and gaining trust for innovative ideas. A visionary leader can also build a robust company relation. They work very hard to build confidence in both direct reports and coworkers.
This type of leadership is precious for small, fast-growing companies and more giant corporations experiencing changes or restructuring.
- Servant leadership style
Servant leaders survive by a people-first mindset and think that when teammates feel professionally and personally satisfied, they are more productive and more likely to generate excellent work regularly. Because of their focus on employee satisfaction and collaboration, they get a high level of respect.
A servant leader is a good leadership style for companies of all sizes and industries, particularly in nonprofits. Such kinds of leaders are excelling in increasing employee morale and assisting employees in re-engaging with their jobs.
- Autocratic leadership style
The autocratic leadership style, also called the authoritarian leadership style, is almost completely focused on results and productivity. They frequently make decisions individually or with a small, trusted group, and they expect staff to execute what they are asked. It can be beneficial to consider such types of leaders in terms of military commanders.
This leadership style can be beneficial in companies with rigorous guidelines or industries which require a lot of compliance. It’s also helpful for employees who need a lot of monitoring, like those with little or no experience. However, this leadership style might hinder innovation and make staff feel trapped.
- Laissez-faire or hands-off leadership style
This leadership type is the opposite of the autocratic leadership style, which emphasizes assigning multiple tasks to team members with little or no monitoring. A laissez-faire leader has more time to devote to other projects because they don’t invest their time deeply in managing employees.
Managers can use this leadership style when all teammates are extremely experienced, well-trained, and need little supervision. Although it can, also lead to a decrease in performance whether employees are uncertain about their leader’s expectations or if many teammates require regular inspiration and restrictions to work effectively.
- Democratic or participative leadership style
The democratic leadership style is also recognized as the participative leadership style, a mix of autocratic and laissez-faire leadership types. Before taking a decision, a democratic leader asks for input and takes feedback from their team. A democratic leadership style is generally credited with promoting higher employee engagement and job satisfaction levels since teammates realize their voices are heard and their efforts valued.
This leadership style is ideal for companies, which emphasized innovation and creativity, like the technology industry, since this leadership style fosters discussion and engagement.
- Pacesetter leadership style
The pacesetting leadership style is among the most effective leadership styles for achieving quick outcomes. Such leaders are often focused on results. They frequently establish high expectations and keep their teammates responsible for meeting such objectives.
Although the pacesetting leadership style is inspirational and beneficial in fast-paced workplaces in which team members must be enthusiastic, this is not always the ideal option for teammates who require instruction and feedback.
- Transformational leadership style
The transformational leadership style is identical to the coaching style, emphasizing employees’ clear communication, goal-setting, and motivation. Although rather than putting most of the efforts into each employee’s personal goals, the transformational leader is fostered by a dedication to company goals.
This leadership style is ideal for teams, which can manage several assigned tasks without regular oversight since these kinds of leaders spend a lot of time on the big picture.
Some Key Takeaways
However, a specific leadership style can be effective in a particular job—for instance, autocratic leaders are influential in the military environment—the best leadership is a combination of various styles. They understand what leadership style to use in a workplace environment, which takes time, experience, practice, and emotional intelligence. Note that many leaders use several styles to attain different objectives at various moments in their careers.
If your current company’s job is not oriented to your long-term goals, consider taking immediate measures. Give yourself time and think about where you’d like to be in the next few years. Feel free to contact JobsPivot for more job opportunities and jobs in singapore to decide your professional path efficiently.